Category Archives: Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama Is Just Like Us

Michelle shoes

Michelle Obama is not an elitist.  She is just like the rest of us.  The First Lady was volunteering for the poor at a D.C. food bank doing her good deed for the month.  I wonder if this was on one of the mandatory volunteer programs?  Anyway, Michelle Obama showed up sporting a pair of $540 tennis shoes.  Not only are they hideous, but who in their right mind spends $540 on a pair of tennis shoes.  If she clicks her heels do you think she gets to go “home”?

The sneakers are made of suede, with grosgrain ribbon laces and metallic pink toe caps and are made by French design house Lanvin, one of fashion’s hottest labels. They come in denim and satin versions and have been selling like crazy.  At least in elitist circles where taste obviously does not matter.

“They’re shoes,” the First Lady’s reps answered when asked about the tennis shoes.  So now the First Lady has the accessories any successful elitist needs: two cute kids she doesn’t have to raise, a cute designer puppy to walk on photo ops, a powerful husband for arm candy and $540 tennis shoes.  She really is the epitome of grace.

Another Hard Hitting CNN Report On Michelle Obama – Her Arms That Is

CNN must be bored. Why cover pressing news stories when you can talk about Michelle Obama’s arms? I have not really had an opportunity to get after Michelle in a while because the Obama goons have kept her muzzled. This has been much to my dismay because she gave me so much fodder. So I guess I’ll have to settle with poking fun at the media who thinks reporting on Michelle’s toned arms makes a difference to most American women who are watching her traipse around the country wining and dining and wearing her children like arm candy on our dime as she seethes with rage against whitey America. Does anyone really believe the Obama children are anything more than pawns or ornaments – symbols of success? The president brings them out for photo ops on occassion and then shoos them away for his moment in the sun.

So CNN quotes a personal trainer named Rylan Duggan who has noticed that his clients are asking for Obama arms. “The Obama effect has been that women of all ages have been inspired to take responsibility for their health and their body,” said Duggan. “As the first lady of the United States, at 44 years old, and with two young children, Mrs. Obama has shown the world that you are never too busy to take care of yourself and look good doing it too.”   Mr. Duggan, we know she’s not too busy to take care of herself.  That is all she does.  Why do you think her poor mother gets dragged around everywhere raising the Obama children like a nanny.  The elite cannot be bothered with children.

Not everyone is a fan though.  Boston Herald columnist Lauren Beckham Falcone wrote to Obama, “It’s February. Going sleeveless in subzero temperature is just showing off. All due respect.”

Then CNN quoted this dimwitted twenty-something:  “This woman is redecorating White House, trying to raise two children and backseat driving the nation,” Rosen said. “She seems to have time to keep her arms toned, so why can’t I?”  Backseat driving the nation?!  God help us!

I’ll give you my advice free of charge:  Push-ups.  Do twenty-five to fifty a day and you’ll have a great toned body with no equipment and it takes 10 minutes maximum.  Now CNN can go back to writing something Michelle Obama really knows something about:  Pie.  Taking my piece of pie and giving it to someone else.

The Obamas’ Brownshirts

You remember hearing about Hitler’s Brownshirts in history class, right?  They preceded the SS and were not a military order, but used street thuggery to get the citizens to fear Hitler and do what he wanted.  They also headed up a group that Hitler established in 1926: The Hitler Youth.  It came to my attention yesterday while listening to the Glenn Beck show that the Obama’s have their fingers in yet another Marxist exploit that mirrors Hitler’s Brownshirts.  He was talking about an article in the Investor’s Business Daily which can be found here:

This exploit is a group called Public Allies which Barack founded in 1992.  He resigned a year later when Michelle Obama became the Executive Director of the Chicago Chapter.  This group is also referred to as “Universal Voluntary Public Service”.  How many times can Obama use the term “universal”?  The above article states, “Big Brother had nothing on the Obamas.  They plan to herd American youth into government-funded re-education camps where they’ll be brainwashed into thinking America is a racist, oppressive place in need of social change.”  The article continues quoting from a document that Public Allies had with its tax filings, “‘Our alumni are more than twice as likely as 18-34 year olds to…engage in protest activities’.”  Investor’s Business Daily also points out that Clinton’s AmeriCorps funds about half of Public Allies expenses.  Also keep in mind that little promise Obama made in his acceptance speech that any youth that volunteered for public service would get their college education at an affordable rate.  Perhaps because Public Allies gives them money for college and – GET THIS – pays them to protest!  How is that volunteer work?

When it comes to this activism that the Obama’s engage in, one has to go way back to a time when a 23 year old Barack Obama was hired by a group of Saul Alinsky devotees to organize black residents on Chicago’s South Side.  That would be that “community organizer” part of his resume.  I hear lots of people asking what that term means, so now you know.  So who is Saul Alinsky?  Well, he is considered the father ofcommunity organizing.  Hillary Clinton was a big fan of his as well.  Alinsky wrote a book called Rules For Radicals.  The name is stunning enough, but even more stunning is when one reads who the book is dedicated to.  It seems Alinsky greatly admires the first radical protestor to rise up against the system and wanted to dedicate this book to him – Lucifer.  Here is an excerpt from this book:

“There’s another reason for working inside the system. Dostoevsky said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution. To bring on this reformation requires that the organizer work inside the system, among not only the middle class but the 40 per cent of American families – more than seventy million people – whose income range from $5,000 to $10,000 a year [in 1971]. They cannot be dismissed by labeling them blue collar or hard hat. They will not continue to be relatively passive and slightly challenging. If we fail to communicate with them, if we don’t encourage them to form alliances with us, they will move to the right. Maybe they will anyway, but let’s not let it happen by default..”

I highlighted those words in blue because this is the tactic that all the liberals use on a regular basis.  I call them “sob stories”.  Everytime Obama says something that would be considered heartwarming he contradicts it by pointing out how horrible conditions are here in America as he did in Terre Haute, Indiana today.  He wants people to feel downtrodden for just this reason.  Now it is fearsome enough to think that Alinsky is a mentor to Barack, but did you know that Michelle Obama quoted this man during her DNC speech?  Gateway Pundit gets credit for pointing this one out.  Alinsky’s book says, “The standards of judgement must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished for fantasy of the world as it should be.”  Michelle said in her speech, “And Barack stood up that day and he spoke words that have stayed with me ever since.  He talked about ‘the world as it is’ and ‘the world as it should be’“.  And she said later, “All of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do; that we have an obligation to fight for the world as it should be.”

This is so much more than just an election anymore.  This really is a fight for our country.  It’s more than just finger pointing at liberals.  There is an underground movement that wants to change America forever.  Yes, I am a bit of a conspiracy buff, but this doesn’t really seem to be a conspiracy anymore.  It is out in the open if you pay attention.  Our children are being indoctrinated in public schools and liberals fight against any school choice.  Forget about abortion, infanticide is ignored in this country.  God is taken out of the public square.  Human caused climate change is pushed around the world as though it were fact – everybody wants to be green because it is cool.  People become sheep and ignore the fact that Al Gore makes money off of carbon credits while he flies in his private jets.  They listen as Sarah Palin’s mothering aptitude is challenged because her daughter is a teen pregnancy and the media tells us she is unfit for command because her husband got a DUI at the same time in history as Obama was snorting cocaine.

This Public Allies is just one of several groups we can expect to see crop up if Obama becomes president.  I would expect to see some kind of marxist Army for adults as well.  You know, we all need to be good little citizens.

Michelle Obama’s DNC Speech Unbelievable

I wish I was saying that because it was so compelling, but the truth is the fact that Michelle Obama was giving the speech gave no credibility to the words.  She started out great focusing on her family which was very good and her father sounds like he was a great man.  I’m trying to figure out how she fell so far from the tree since she holds him in such high regard.

Some of the nuggets from the speech include: “The American dream endures”, “You work hard for what you want in life”, “Teach children to work hard for dreams”, and “America is where you can make it if you try”.  So where exactly do those statements fit on the liberal platform and Barack Obama’s platform?  After months of hearing sob story after sob story (and there are more to come here at the convention in full living color as these down-on-their-luckers tell their stories in person) I find it hard to believe that the Obamas believe those words.  The liberals believe in letting others work hard so they can take more from them to give to those who just are having a hard time of it.  More taxes for the rich will not solve the problem that a welfare system has created.  More taxes will not be able to keep up with the outrageous plans Barack has for this country.  There is no hard work in living off the government.  There is no such thing as affordable healthcare for everyone.  We will all pay dearly one way or the other with universal healthcare whether it means not being able to get care or our healthcare system spirally downward like those in socialistic countries.  There is no such thing as a dream that endures in a country that took Michelle Obama 43 years to finally be proud of.  This woman – as I have documented on my blog – wants to take from your piece of pie to give more to someone who has less.  They want charity by force.

And speaking of charity, Michelle said that “I’ve tried to give back as much as I’ve been given”.  Let me try to get this straightened out in my brain.  Is she talking about the year the Obamas gave back 1% to charity or was that the 6% or most probably she was talking about the 7% they gave back?  I know it’s hard to do when your family only makes a half million dollars a year.  Or perhaps she was referring to Barack’s half-brother who lives in a hut on $12 a year.  Didn’t someone once say, “Charity begins at home?”

And then, of course, she had to throw in the old, “I love this country.”  She says it so much now I’m not sure if she is trying to just convince us or herself.  I remain unconvinced. 

This was an historic night.  I have to admit that it was wonderful to see a black woman giving an important speech because her husband could be the next president.  It says alot about our country.  Unfortunately, the speech would have been so much more if it would have come from someone else.  Someone whom we could actually believe and trust.  Someone who is genuine and doesn’t have to change who they are to fit a mold.  It actually was more damaging in my eyes to see that Michelle has thrown away her core beliefs to be more palatable.  Although I could never agree with her, I could respect her for being true to herself.  Now I don’t think she even knows who see is anymore and that could prove to be disasterous in the future.

Don’t Let Michelle Obama Fool You

One of my favorite people has stepped out in the limelight again after making a transformation – oh, damn, I’m not suppose to talk about her anymore right or Barack is going to get me.  Anyway, the media is fawning all over her again after her appearance on The View.  But her little fist bump to all the girls and talk of legs sans pantyhose doesn’t fool me one bit.  I’ve seen her red soul and it still is there.  You can’t cover it over with a new hair-do and a smile.  It must be hard to hold a smile when you have spent most of your life pissed off that the only opportunities you’ve had are Princeton and $ 300,000+ income jobs.  This woman is going to be hosting world leaders and terrorists – keep that in mind.

So Whoopi Goldberg – who I must admit has made some of my favorite movies – stepped in it big time as she fawned over Michelle.  Goldberg wanted to make a point to all of America that people like me have taken Michelle out of context or omitted words when speaking of Michelle’s “first time being proud” comments.  She played a clip in which Michelle said that this was the first time she was REALLY proud of her country.  Supposedly, we have all omitted that word and somehow that makes a difference in what she said.  Unfortunately for Whoopi, Michelle made that speech more than once and twice that day.  In some of these other tapes Michelle herself omits the word “really”.

Then Bawara Wawers had to put in her two cents worth.  She asked poor Michelle why she thought Republicans were going after her and causing controversy.  Why was she being attacked?  What a laugh!  If you repeat back to someone something they said verbatim and ask them to explain, it’s an attack?  I guess if your a liberal.  Message to the adulterer known as Walters:  Michelle causes controversy by opening her mouth and spilling forth excrement.  In this country we still have freedom of speech (Unless the Fairness Doctrine passes) and that means we also have the freedom to be put on the spot over what we say.

As a reminder of who Michelle Obama really is, look at this infamous quote of hers (nobody asked her about this one of course), “We’re going to have to make sacrifices, we’re going to have to change our conversation, we’re going to have to change our traditions, our history and we’re going to have to move to a different place.”  Would that place be the Soviet Union?  Change our history?!  I thought the past was the past.  Don’t go screwing with our American traditions either, Michelle.  One of those traditions is following the path laid by the Founding Fathers.  Covering your heart during the National Anthem is another.  And patriotism ranks up there as well.  And sacrifices?!  You mean paying more taxes to cover the bloated spending your husband has on tap.  Or possibly giving up the Constitution? 

Don’t be fooled – you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig (or in this case a sickle and hammer).  And no, I’m not calling Michelle a pig which I’m sure the liberals would love to accuse me of that.