Category Archives: Conspiracy

Is Nevada Tea Party Candidate A Plant?

Florida was the first state to have a Tea Party political party registered.  It has been a controversial move and decried by the tea party groups in Florida.  Conservatives know that a third party would take away votes in the November elections and let the Marxists continue their onslaught.  Now Nevada has a registered Tea Party political party as well.  The candidate who co-registered the group and is running on the ticket in Nevada is very similar to the Floridian Tea Party candidate.

Scott Ashjian is the Nevada candidate.  He is a lawyer and owes $200,000 in back taxes.  Frederic O’Neal is the Florida candidate and he is a lawyer who owes $155,000 in back taxes.  Coincidence?  O’Neal is also a former Democrat.  There may be nothing nefarious here, but I would not put it past the Progressives to start these political parties and fund the candidates in an effort to take votes away from the Republicans.  After a Rasmussen Poll revealed that a Tea Party candidate would beat out both Republicans and Democrats, who would doubt the conniving minds of Progressives?

The Patriot Caucus has run a poll asking if people would like Scott Ashjian to step aside and over 90% say, “Yes.”  No tea party organizer will vouch for Ashjian either.  The same is true in Florida for the candidate here.  Twenty Nevada Tea Party groups have released a public statement as follows:

For Immediate Release: March 10, 2010
From Nevada grassroots and tea party leaders
Subject: Unified Statement / Grassroots Nevada is United

We, the grassroots/tea party leaders of Nevada, speaking for the conservative activists in our communities, are united in issuing the following statement.

• We are united in denouncing the TPN (Tea Party of Nevada).
-o The TPN is not a conservative party who speaks for grassroots and tea party activists in Nevada.
-o The TPN is not now, has never been, and will never be affiliated with grassroots efforts in Nevada.
-o The term “Tea Party Candidate” will no longer be used to indicate grassroots support for a candidate or candidates.
-o The TPN will not be invited to or allowed to represent themselves at conservative grassroots events and functions across Nevada.
• We are united in our desire for fiscal responsibility, transparency, and accountability from legislators and in legislation from Carson City, NV and Washington, D.C.
• We are united in opposition of progressive leanings towards unfunded mandates as a solution to appeasing special interest and delivering ‘social justice’.
• We are united in the belief that our government should be inspiring pride and accountability, and personal strength and opportunity, not a path for us to follow to have our needs met as the government sees fit.

We, the tea party activists and grassroots organizers in Nevada, are united.

Signed on March 10, 2010:

-Anger is Brewing / Debbie Landis
-National Precinct Alliance / Tony Warren
-Citizens Awareness Network / Jesse Law
-Nevada Action Coalition / Duane Smith
-Citizens in Action / Juanita Cox
-Nevada Families Eagle Forum / Janine Hanson
-Fallon Tea Party II / Bob Clifford
-Nevada Patriots / Diana Orrock
-Gardnerville Tea party / Ron Stevens
-NvRA / Travis Christensen
-Glenn Beck Meetup Group/ Sally Minster
-P.A.C.T. / Janice Baldwin
-Grassroots Nevada / Jamie Costello
-Reject Reid / Sheila Danish
-Las Vegas 9-12’ers / Jeff Waffle
-Nevada 9-12 Americans / Charlene Bybee
-Las Vegas Tea Party / Frank Ricotta
-Western Representation PAC / Dustin Stockton
-Patriot Caucus / Eric Odom
-Winnemucca Tea Party / Mike Myrhow

We must stand against any Tea Party political party to protect the Union!

9/11 Truther Takes Aim At Pentagon

And he misses.  John Patrick Bedell walked into the Pentagon yesterday wearing a business suit and surprised police when the cell phone they thought he was reaching for turned out to be a gun.  Bedell grazed two of the police officers before bring shot in the head.  He later died of his wounds.  The question is about motive and we may never know, but there are clues via the internet.

Bedell appears to be a 9/11 Truther.  While I believe that it is appropriate to still have questions about the events surrounding 9/11, Bedell was certifiably a Troofer.  The reason I say this is because he believed the preposterous theory that the World Trade Center and a nearby building (WTC 7) were demolished.  The idea that the government that cannot run the post office was able to pull off rigging the buildings and demolishing them successfully without anyone involved breathing a word about it, is just plain wacky.

His resentments over those events and anger at the military are supposedly the reasons why he decided to commence this attack.  The mainstream media will waste no time trying to link him to the Tea Party Movement just as the man who crashed his plane into the Texas IRS building was initially linked to the Movement. 

Alex Jones’ website Prison Planet, has released a posting this morning questioning whether this incident is another conspiracy due to its proximity with a report from the Southern Poverty Law Center that more attacks from extremists were expected.  Paul Joseph Watson writes, “Such incidents will dovetail perfectly with the rapid advancement of cybersecurity and Internet censorship laws that will force people to obtain licenses to exercise free speech on the web, while providing Homeland Security with the perfect pretext to increase surveillance of all Internet traffic and communications.”  I actually believe that argument holds no water because my common sense brain believes that the government loves for people to express these kinds of whacked out theories, like 9/11 was a demolition, because it furthers their argument that concerned citizens like myself are dangerous extremists.

The real truth here is that Bedell is a lunatic, plain and simple regardless of his conspiracy theory beliefs.  What we will see happen is people on the left paint him as a right wing extremist, while people on the right will paint him as a Moon Landing denier.  Both of these attitudes are wrong.  While some conspiracy theories are crazy, like denial of the moon landing, others are legitimate.  I do wonder why big international groups meet secretly.  I do wonder if the government is ruining our economy on purpose.  And yes, I do wonder if Lee Harvey Oswald acted of his own accord or if he was a hired hitman to take down a president who wanted our money backed by silver and hated Communism.  I have many questions about the Federal Reserve. 

Thankfully, Bedell is a horrible shot or too high on the marijuana he loved and so no one was murdered.

Infrastructure For Obama’s Brownshirts

The President has signed another Executive Order that has flown under the radar in the same way that the Interpol Executive Order did a few weeks ago.  This new Executive Order appears to be setting up the infrastructure for Obama’s Civilian Corp. or something I have dubbed for the past year and a half: Obama’s Brownshirts.

This Executive Order, known as “Executive Order Establishing Council of Governors”, sets up the framework for the use of federal troops and combines state and federal agencies within the Department of Defense. This order was signed yesterday and enables the federal and state governments to work together to protect the nation from hazards.  This sounds like a good idea on the surface, but not when considering that the lines defined by the Tenth Amendment are already blurred and when considering that the federal government is busily building a Marxist Utopia.

The Council’s responsibilities include reviewing matters that involve the National Guard of the various States; homeland security; civil support; synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland security, and civil support activities.  The council will be made up of ten governors selected by the President to serve for two years.  Members from the federal government will be included as well and will be represented by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, the Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement, the Assistant Secretary of Defence for Homeland Defence and Americas’ Security Affairs, the U.S. Northern Command Commander, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, and the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.

The Press release of the executive order is as follows:

The White House Office of the Press SecretaryFor Immediate Release January 11, 2010

EXECUTIVE ORDER ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS: By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1822 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-181), and in order to strengthen further the partnership between the Federal government and State governments to protect our Nation and its people and property, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Council of Governors.(a) There is established a Council of Governors (Council).  The Council shall consist of 10 State Governors appointed by the President (Members), of whom no more than five shall be of the same political party. The term of service for each Member appointed to serve on the Council shall be 2 years, but a Member may be reappointed for additional terms. (b) The President shall designate two Members, who shall not be members of the same political party, to serve as Co-Chairs of the Council.

Sec. 2. Functions. The Council shall meet at the call of the Secretary of Defense or the Co-Chairs of the Council to exchange views, information, or advice with the Secretary of Defense; the Secretary of Homeland Security; the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism; the Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement; the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas’ Security Affairs; the Commander, United States Northern Command; the Chief, National GuardBureau; the Commandant of the Coast Guard; and other appropriate officials of the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, and appropriate officials of other executive departments or agencies as may be designated by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Homeland Security.Such views, information, or advice shall concern: (a) matters involving the National Guard of the variousStates; (b) homeland defense; (c) civil support; more (OVER) 2(d) synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and (e) other matters of mutual interest pertaining toNational Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities.

Sec. 3. Administration. (a) The Secretary of Defense shall designate an ExecutiveDirector to coordinate the work of the Council. (b) Members shall serve without compensation for theirwork on the Council. However, Members shall be allowed travelexpenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, asauthorized by law. (c) Upon the joint request of the Co-Chairs of the Council, the Secretary of Defense shall, to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, provide the Council with administrative support, assignment or detail of personnel, and information as may benecessary for the performance of the Council’s functions. (d) The Council may establish subcommittees of the Council. These subcommittees shall consist exclusively of Members of the Council and any designated employees of a Member with authority to act on the Member’s behalf, as appropriate to aid the Council in carrying out its functions under this order. (e) The Council may establish a charter that is consistent with the terms of this order to refine further its purpose, scope, and objectives and to allocate duties, as appropriate, among members.

Sec. 4. Definitions.  As used in this order: (a) the term “State” has the meaning provided in paragraph (15) of section 2 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002(6 U.S.C. 101(15)); and (b) the term “Governor” has the meaning provided inparagraph (5) of section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122(5)). (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair orotherwise affect: (1) the authority granted by law to adepartment, agency, or the head thereof; or(2) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary,administrative, or legislative proposals. (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability ofappropriations.Sec. 5. General Provisions. more 3 (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMATHE WHITE HOUSE, January 11, 2010.

Interpol’s Obama Protectionism

The blogosphere has been buzzing with a story and an Executive Order that has flown under the radar.  Last week, Barack Obama signed an amendment to Executive Order 12425.  The Executive Order announcement from the Office of The Spokesmoron reads:

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release
December 17, 2009

Executive Order — Amending Executive Order 12425

EXECUTIVE ORDER
– – – – – – –

AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL
AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO
ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.

BARACK OBAMA

Upon reading this, many people would just pass over the legalese as nothing to worry about. Scrutiny of the particular section referenced proves how nefarious this action is to America. Section (c) reads:

(c) Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable.

That is inviolable by even United States sovereignty.  That would include the Interpol office in the Department of Defense.  This protects Interpol from the Freedom of Information Act.  Several bloggers have pointed out that the United States could hand documents over to Interpol to keep them from American citizens.  The President has now exempted Interpol from search and seizure.  This places Interpol above the FBI, CIA and the Constitution.

During the reign of the Third Reich and Hitler, Interpol was under the jurisdiction of the SS.  Interpol was headquartered in Austria and Hitler knew that whoever ruled Austria would have control of Interpol.  Germany conquered Austria early during World War II and thus the SS had control of Interpol.  Interpol elected a Nazi as their vice-president in 1937.  That Nazi, General Kurt Daluege, was executed for war crimes in 1946.  The presence of Nazis in Interpol did not deter the FBI from seeking membership with Interpol and it did so under J. Edgar Hoover.  The U.S. paid $1,500 in annual dues and gained membership in 1938.

In 1996, Interpol signed a partnership agreement with the United nations and the two work hand in hand in their efforts.  Interpol’s website states that the agreement provides for the following:

“The co-operation agreement grants the two organizations observer status in sessions of their respective general assemblies. The agreement outlines further areas in which the two organizations could co-ordinate their efforts:

  • responding to the needs of the international community in fighting crime
  • assisting states in their efforts to combat organized crime
  • co-operating in the implementation of the mandates of international judicial bodies
  • carrying out joint investigations and other police-related matters in the context of peace-keeping
  • establishing joint databases related to penal law.”

Anyone who has observed the history of the United Nations, finds their claims of peacekeeping to be laughable. Their peacekeepers raped African women. The United Nations has worked for years to put American sovereignty under international treaties and now apparently, Interpol is working towards that same end.

I expect our next move will be to join the International Criminal Court, which will again undermine American sovereignty.  And Obama would probably love to present former vice president Dick Cheney to that court for war crimes.  Andy McCarthy of National Review Online rightly asks, “Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?”  McCarthy also covers the history of Executive Order 12425 originally signed by Ronald Reagan, but with stipulations that left Interpol open to U.S. search and seizure.

Obama promised that he and his groupies were “five days away from fundamentally changing America.”  The past year has revealed to what lengths Obama and his administration will go to in order to create that fundamental change.  He did promise hope and change.  America has gotten that change and it is erasing our hope.  The New Global World Order’s infrastructure is being built around us.

The Indoctrination Continues…

The government schools will not be happy until they have indoctrinated our children to the point of Hitler’s Youth.  The second song in this video reminds me of the black and white films I have seen of German children singing about their “lord” who is Hitler.  In the first song, the children sing, “He said red, yellow, black or white, all are equal in his sight, mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack Hussein Obama.”  I remember singing a similar song in Sunday School about Jesus.  Just a coincidence I’m sure.  And people think we are paranoid.  How many more of these videos need to surface for people to realize what is happening here.  If this had been Bush, people would have been breaking windows on the street and rioting.

Obama Brownshirts On The Move

Coming to a city near you soon and don’t you just love the RED jackets.  I guess that is quite appropriate considering that these kids are being indoctrinated and used to bring their own future crashing down around them.  Ronald Reagan once said that there might come a day when we have to tell the children what freedom was like – we will also have to explain why we threw it away.

What Is With This Swine Flu?

Occassionally, I do find myself reaching for my tinfoil hat and today is one of those days.  I featured the news today on my Freedom’s Wings Radio Show that some kind of new influenza dubbed the “swine flu” had broken out.  As I read the news story and said the words, “This virus is a mix of human, pig and bird strains…” I found myself wondering how in the world that was possible and commented to that effect.  Really…how do human, pig and bird flus combine genetically in a natural setting?  My common sense brain tells me that type of scenario is just not possible.  This has to be some kind of man-made virus.  A caller to my show shared the same belief and I am seeing similar beliefs popping up around the internet.

The other item that makes this outbreak strange is the fact that America has outbreaks in four different states currently: Texas, California, Kansas and New York.  The swine flu appears to have originated in Mexico so border states seem like likely places for the flu to cross over, but New York and Kansas?  So far 68 people have died, but no one in America as of yet.  There have been 11 cases here thus far.

World Health Organization director-general, Margaret Chan, said the outbreak in Mexico and the United States constituted a “public health emergency of international concern.”  This declaration stops short of declaring that borders be closed and does not call the virus a “pandemic”, but the WHO did say that it has that potential.

So my questions are who made this stuff, was this some kind of laboratory experiment and who released it or how was it released?  Could this be some kind of bioweapon?  My tinfoil hat is buzzing.  I guess we will have to stay tuned for details, but I am watching this thing like a hawk while I also keep my attention on what the media is not reporting.  Usually when big stories like this are released and one hand is talking all about that here, the other hand is doing something over there that we are not suppose to be watching.  Call me a conspiracy nut job, but something is not adding up here.